Tag: Battle


Devotional Mark:14:68

Good  Morning Yamon Ki Yesepar and Nevim Arith Hayomin:

Mark 14:68: “But he denied, saying, I know not, neither understand I what thou sayest.  And he went out on the porch; and the cock crew.”

General Joshua Chamberlain, the hero of the Battle of Little Roundtop during the Civil War, told the story of an event near the end of the Civil War.  His men had captured some Confederate soldiers who were from the very deep south.   He sent his aide to interrogate them and also to find out why they were continuing to fight.  These men were simple mountain men who knew nothing of slavery or politics and he was curious as to why they were fighting.  The aide returned and reported to General Chamberlain.  When the General asked what their reasons were for fighting the aide reported: “They are fighting for their rats, sir.”   General Chamberlain decided to interrogate these men himself, if it were rats they wanted they had plenty in the North to give them.  When he spoke with the prisoners he heard their very thick Southern accents and being a language professor himself he understood what they were saying when they said: “We all are a fitin fer er rots sir.”   They were fighting for their rights.

There were three major Aramaic dialects in Jesus’s day.  There was the Northern or Galilean dialect which Jesus and his disciples spoke.  This was the more common dialect used by the Assyrians and came into wide use during the rise of the Assyrian Empire  in  1100 BC.   It became a trade language and continued with the rise of the Babylonian Empire.   The Jews of Israel spoke a Southern or Chaldean Aramaic but when the Northern Kingdom was taken into captivity, the Jews of the Northern kingdom assimilated their Southern dialect or Chaldean dialect into the Northern or Galilean dialect.

The Jews in the Southern Kingdom, Judea, who were taken into captivity by the Babylonians also spoke a Southern  or Chaldean Aramaic which they retained while in captivity.  This is the language that the Book of Daniel and Ezra was written in.   There was a third dialect, the Western Aramaic  which was the language of the Syrian kingdom and dates back to the days of Abraham.  Syria’s original name was really Aram.   However, the Northern or Galilean dialect displaced the Western dialect  after the Assyrians conquered Syria in 722 BC.

What is interesting is that this Galilean dialect or Northern dialect became the dialect used by the Northern ten tribes who were first carried away by Assyria and then with large Assyrian colonies were transplanted back into Galilee and Samaria and hence the Galilean dialect became the dialect used by the Samaritans and the Galileans.  However, when the Jews returned to Judea, they continued to speak the Northern dialect.
A very basic understanding of Biblical Geography is needed here.  There were really three sections of Israel during Jesus day.  There was the Northern most section known as Galilee where the largest city was Nazareth.   Then below that was Samaria where the largest city was, oddly, Samaria.  Then the Southern portion was Judea where the largest city was Jerusalem.   Although Jesus was born in Bethlehem,  which was in the Southern portion of Israel or Judea, he grew up in the North or Galilee.  His disciples were also from Galilee.   This is why Jesus had to pass through Samaria to reach Jerusalem on his journey to the cross.   This was quite an adventure for the disciples in that day to journey all the way from the North  down to the South, through Samaria and into the holy city of Jerusalem where the temple stood.

The Northern portion of Israel, Galilee and Samaria, spoke the Northern or Galilean dialect.  The Southern portion  spoke a Southern dialect.  There is not only a difference in pronunciation like General Chamberlain found, but there was also a difference in colloquial expression. When Jesus spoke to Nicodemus, there was that misunderstanding in the colloquial expression of being “born again.”  In the Southern dialect spoken by Nicodemus, he would have taken the words “born again” literally, where Jesus, speaking the Galilean dialect,  would have been using the term figuratively.

In the case of poor old Peter his Northern accent made him dead meat.  When he spoke up he would have sounded like a Yankee Methodist in a Southern Baptist convention.   Galileans were a rare bird in Jerusalem and even a young maid servant could tell this old boy was one of those following the Galilean being tried simply by his “Yankee” accent.

I attended a church service yesterday where communion was being given.  I was greatly troubled when the worship leader quoted the words of Jesus to eat his body and drink his blood.  I had just been studying the colloquial expressions of the old Galilean or Northern Aramaic verses the Southern Aramaic.   The speaker  and those around me were most likely thinking in terms of the Southern Aramaic which would express the idea of taking this communion as a memorial to the death of Jesus.  Yet, in the Old Galilean dialect Jesus would have used the word, as recorded in the Aramaic text, dacar, which in the Hebrew is zacar.  In the old Galilean dialect this would not only men to partake of this communion as a remembrance, but as an offering as well.  In the Old Galilean the expression, eat my body and drink my blood is a colloquial expression for enduring many hardships and sacrifices for someone.    Not more than a few hours after the last supper where Jesus asked his disciples to remember his sacrifice with sacrifices of their own did Peter bail out of his commitment.

As I sat there in church contemplating what Jesus meant when He spoke those words and what I would be doing by participating in this communion, promising my Savior that I would memorialize his sacrifice with whatever hardship or sacrifice I would need to endure for His sake, I found myself “fighting for my rats.”

{Word Study} Take, Seize “Lakach”

I Samuel 4:3: “And when the people were come into the camp, the elders of Israel said, Wherefore hath the Lord smitten us today before the Philistines?  Let us fetch the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of Shiloh unto us, that when it cometh among us, it may save us out of the hand of our enemies.”

Take, Seize – Hebrew: lakach – Take, fetch, to seize control or take possession of something that is not yours.
In the Hebrew the nation of Israel is asking: “Why did God defeat us? ” Israel was shocked that God had let them down.   I am surprised too, the only sin that is mentioned is with the house of Eli and his corrupt sons running the worship services.  Is God punishing the whole nation because of the sins of the religious leadership? Their sin was not in their acts but their hearts. Perhaps the next move by Israel is a clue as to the heart of the nation which shows they were no better than their leadership.

The elders said: “Let us take the ark of the covenant of the Lord out of Shiloh unto us.”  The word for “take” or “fetch” is “lakach” which is taking possession or control of something that is not rightfully yours.   They then added the word: “elinu” which is rendered “unto us.”  Using this form suggest a play on words for “our god.”    In other words they were saying they would seize control of the ark of the covenant to be a god for them.  Then they said “that it might save us.”  Some translations will say that “he might save us.”  Indeed there is no neuter pronoun in Hebrew, but the syntax does suggest that the elders are saying “it” the ark of the covenant and not “He” or God will save us.

Think about it. The most sacred object in the land, the object where the very presence of God rested became an idol, a god.  They knew enough to know that the ark could only be carried by a priest and they either bribed or forced the sons of Eli to carry the ark into battle.  However, they did not know enough to know that it really didn’t matter for apparently the presence of God was not going to manifest itself at this time on the ark. The midrash suggests that the nation of Israel was to consult the ark.  Apparently, they did not need to carry the ark into battle, only consult with God as to what to do in battle.  In other words, the elders had the right idea, but the wrong approach.

In my own life when I enter into battle and get defeated and crawl back licking my wounds, I begin to ask: “God, why did you let me down?”   Then just like Israel I go and seize the Ark.   I start to carry my Bible around, I make sure I read it every day, I play only religious music and spiritual songs.  I begin praising and worshipping because I have heard that brings the power and presence of God.  I listen to testimonies of others who were victorious and try to follow their steps to victory.  I am then ready to go back into battled.  I now have the Ark with me and I  am certain that “it” will save me, yet I end up suffering even a worst defeat.  So what went wrong?  All my good religious practices were “elinu” for me, or a god to me.   They were used to bribe God but not to consult God.

Sometimes the enemy can use even the most sacred thing in our lives to deflect us away from the heart of God. That little cross we carry in our pocket or around our necks become objects or good luck charms to ward off evil things rather than serving as a simple reminder of the one we love.