HEBREW WORD STUDY – I WILL PUT – ‘ASIM אשׁימ
Exodus 15:26: And he said: If thou wilt diligently harken unto the voice of God and will do that which is right in His sight, and will give ear to His commandments and keep all His statutes, I will put none of these diseases upon thee.
Some faith healer or Word-Faith teacher once taught and likely still do that the Hebrew says God will only allow the diseases to come upon us and as this teaching passed from teacher to teacher it went through an evolutionary process. Soon teachers began to impress their audiences by throwing out Hebrew terms and of course if you don’t know Hebrew and the old boy has a platform he must be a Hebrew expert and you can’t argue against that. What they started to say was that in the Hebrew this is in a permissive tense. There is no such thing as a permissive tense in Hebrew.
Eventually, these teachers started to teach that the verb put was in a permissive tense rather than a causative tense but since there was no way to express the permissive tense in English translators put it in the causative tense. Huh? As their authority, they threw out the name of a Hebrew scholar, Dr. Robert Young. When I heard that I began to understand how they came up with this teaching. I made a study of Dr. Young’s work while doing my doctoral dissertation. He is indeed a distinguished Hebrew scholar.
Dr. Robert Young did a controversial work on the use of the Jussive form in the Hebrew. Unfortunately, his conclusion was picked up by teachers who had no background in the study of Biblical Hebrew but did have a large audience and they applied his theory to Exodus 15:26 which became a sensational hit among faith healers and the Word-Faith movement. This misunderstanding got passed on from one faith healer to another who did not check their sources and it eventually evolved to a teaching of a permissive tense and actually began to take on the form of some sort of conspiracy by Bible translators to cover up God’s true intentions with regard to healing.
Here is where the misunderstanding lies. As simply as possible, in Hebrew, there are three volitional forms or three expressions of will – Jussive which is generally found in the first person, Imperative which is found in the 2nd person and Cohortative which is used in a third person. These volitional forms can express a speaker’s desire, wish or command. The Jussive may occur in the third person when the verb is in an imperfect state. Unfortunately, there is nothing to distinguish a Jussive from an imperfect tense.
Dr. Robert Young presents the idea that the verb put in Exodus 15:16 is in a Jussive form. He made the mistake, and as a true scholar, he openly admitted to that mistake of calling it a permissive form. What he meant was that this particular Jussive could be rendered as permissive. Teachers not schooled in Hebrew picked up on this and called it a permissive tense. For one thing, we are not talking about a tense, tenses do not exist in Hebrew and as I said there is no such thing as a permissive form in Hebrew.
A Jussive form expresses the will of the speaker, in other words, it is God’s will to put diseases upon people. The status, position, and context of the speaker, will determine the nature of the expression of the speaker’s will. It may be a command, a request or a wish. Dr. Young for various reasons determined that this verb put is in a Jussive form was expressing permission.
I tend to disagree with Dr. Young as he did not consider the use of the Jussive in other Semitic languages. For instance, the Canaanite dialect which preceded the Hebrew will often derive the Jussive from the short yaqtul form. The verb asim (I will put) is found in the long form and not the short and would thus lay a serious question that this is truly a Jussive form. Just because it is in a third person and imperfect tense does not automatically make it Jussive as Dr. Young seems to indicate. I am not the only one here, most Hebrew scholars take serious issue with Dr. Young in his use of the Jussive.
Secondly, let’s just assume it is in a Jussive form, this would not mean it is permissive, it could simply be an expression of a desire or wish. You have a lot of hoops to jump through just to get this to a permissive state. I think we are better off and more grammatically sound to just keep this as the KJV puts it, that is “He will put none of these diseases upon you.”
I wish I could say God will not permit these diseases to come upon you, but I can’t, I’m sorry.
Although non-believers will eventually face judgement, we need to remember that Exodus 15:26 is a message addressed to His people, not outsiders. So I am not too sure that portraying God as angry and ready to lash out to punish sin is an accurate depiction of His real message. I also think that it distorts the gospel of Jesus Christ and turns Jesus into nothing more than that perfect sacrifice. God is presented to us as a loving Father/husband determined to be reconciled with the people of this world who have gone astray. His focus is on rescuing us from our situation and restoring the world into a right relationship with Him – not punishing us. I think God would want people to follow Him out of love and the promise of a glorious future rather than fear of being punished, wouldn’t He?
Thank you for clearing up the concept of the “permissive” tense. I was sort of hoping that an interpretation along the lines of Dr Young’s Jussive form could be substantiated. I think many of us would like to think “permissive” even if no such thing exists in Hebrew but even if it could, it doesn’t really ease the tension between the notion of a loving and caring Father God and that He would inflict suffering, directly or indirectly. The implications of this verse as you have translated without further qualification are troubling. The verse does say that God will not inflict diseases on the obedient. It suggests that perfect obedience will ward off diseases – an impossible task so I can expect that from time to time God will inflict a disease on me because I have been disobedient. Yet, experience would tell us that this is not so cut-and-dried since there appears to be no correlation between sickness and obedience. I wonder how Moses would have understood this verse? Does it mean that God will necessarily afflict us with a disease to punish us and therefore we are to be meticulously careful to obey out of fear of retribution?
So then, I think any deliberation about such scripture needs to be complimented with a word or two about that conundrum, sensitive to believers who may be battling with some medical condition and wondering if they have sinned against God to deserve their affliction. In my opinion, punishment for sin of believers has already been borne on the Cross. More importantly, Exodus 15:26 does not imply that if we are afflicted, God’s love for us has turned cold or that God deliberately zapped us with a disease. We know that sickness and disease entered the world because of sin. Exodus 15:26 tells me that God is still in control over this and we are not at the mercy of our environment. Didn’t Paul say that nothing will be able to separate us from the love of God (Romans 8:35-39)?
Thanks for letting God be God.
ps
the gravity of this verse raises our gratitude for Mashiach’s victory!
on this side of the brit chadasha,
what would have been judgment / disease,
and rightly so, is filtered through the sacrifice of Yeshua.
The Law of the Spirit of Life
now cries MERCY against the Law of condemnation.
It is also a good thing to appeal to the goodness of God
who forgives ALL our iniquities and heals ALL of our diseases. OT psalm 103.
God looked for someone to intercede before Him to hold back His anger….He found Him. Yeshua Jesus